close
Alsadiqin English Alsadiqin English
Search

Origin of the Druze


A working paradigm for the origin of Druze.
By Ben Abrahamson, Feb 12, 2008.

I propose that the Druze are the descendants of Parthians who converted to Judaism, either as full converts or Bnei Noah. Historiographical records indicate that hellenistic Parthians had been pushed into what is now Syria after the Sassanid dynasty came to power. Other records indicate the close relationship between the Parthians and the Jews. DNA studies also appear to support this. [The Druze claim to be the descendants of Shoaib (Jethro, Yitro) which would make them the Kenites, which Onkelos translates as Salamai. However DNA research has not yet supported a Semitic (Arab "Midian", Samaritan or Jewish) ancestry of the Druze.[1]]

On the eve of Islam, the Persians invaded towards Egypt and Constantinople, with the current exilarch, Nehemiah ben Hushiel, as a figurehead for the troops heading towards Egypt. The Persians promised to reinstate Palestine if the Jews would fight for them. The murder of this exilarch in Jerusalem led to the sack and burning of the city in 614 CE by Jewish and Persian troops. This led to a backlash, and the Persians ceased to support the exilarch, and evicted the Jews.[2]

A series of exilarchs, Nehemiah's sons, made their base in Syria: Heman (Abdullah ibn Saba) and Yakub of Syria (Kab Ahbar), Ishak, Saura of Syria, Yakub Obadiah.[3] When Byzantine emperor Heraclius began to slaughter all the Jews in his domain, a delegation of twelve Jews from Edessa, Syria (now Şanlıurfa, Turkey), met with an Arabian leader in Aqaba seek their support.[4] I propose that this is what is known in Islamic tradition as "the first declaration of Aqaba".

A companion of the Prophet Muhammed was Nehemiah's brother Shallum (Salmaan Farsi), who had been sold into slavery by the Persians. Many stories (midrashei geulah) appeared making much of the fact that the Messiah (exilarch Nehemiah) had been killed, or had disappeared, or raised again from the dead by the Prophet (mistaking Shallum for Nehemiah). Shallum led the conquest of Persia and was buried in ancient seat of the Exilarch, Mahoza (now called Salman Pak). Messianic expectations first fell on Caliph 'Umar who was called al Furkan (Purkan, redeemer) and later on 'Ali who's mother was a descended of the exilarch.[5] I propose the messianic themes of redeemer, military conquerer, occlusion and being raised from the dead became the foundation of the Islamic concept of the Imamate. Also the relationship between Prophet Muhammed and Shallum (Salmaan Farsi) led to a tradition of Islamic leader and a Jewish vizier that was to be followed throughout the Umayyad and Fatimid caliphate.[6] I propose the Jewish tradition of Elijah and Messiah, as Prophet and Exilarch, was transformed to Mahdī and Masīḥ, with the former growing in importance and the later being reduced.

After the Islamic conquest, there was a shortage of judges during the early days of Islamic rule (from 638 CE until about 661 CE), so the Islamic rulers sent out Jewish judges to teach the law.[7] This was under the supervision of R' Yitzchak Gaon and the head of the Yeshivah of Peroz-Shavur, so it probably was the rabbinic concept of Noahidism that was taught.[8] I propose that these Dayyanim later evolved into Da'iyyun (preachers) of the Umayyad dynasty.

The Jewish sympathizers of Islam in Syria and Egypt were known as Musta'arabi Jews (Arabic, "Arabizers"). I propose that because the Noahides were known as Toshavim, their center was in Aleppo which became known as Tsobah (Toshaviyya).[9] I propose that rabbinic traditions about Jethro (Yitro) as the "first convert" led to his name as شعيب (Shoaib, Toshav).

With the rise of the Abbasid dynasty in 750 CE, the Islamic leadership saw no more use for Jews within its ranks. Originally they tried to break the power of the Exilarch by officially recognizing Karaism, later they encouraged the development of Jewish leadership in Baghdad as completely separate and independent of Islam. Abbasid dynasty was largely an Iranian phenomenon, ignoring Syria, Palestine and Egypt. The Umayyad dynasty was reborn in North Africa and Egypt as the Fātimid dynasty.

The Berbers of North Africa had for a hundred years before Islam accepted Judaism under Berber Queen Kahana. The Fatimid dynastic was founded in 909 by 'Abdullāh al-Mahdī Billah. He began his conquest by establishing his headquarters at Salamiyah[10], Syria and began riding towards north-western Africa, which at the time was under Aghlabid rule, following the propagandist success of his chief Dai' (preacher), Abu 'Abdullah Al-Husayn Al-Shi'i. Al-Shi'i, along with laying claim to being the precursor to the Mahdi, was instrumental in sowing the seeds of sedition among the formerly Jewish Berber tribes of North Africa, specifically the Kutamah tribe.

Druze believe the sixth Fātimid caliph Abū 'Alī al-Manṣūr al-Ḥākim bi-Amr Allāh (996-1021), who ruled over Egypt (985–1021), seen by others as eccentric, to be the uniter of Muslims and nourisher of the Islamic power at that time. The first to hold that view was a man called Hasan ibn Haidara al-Ahram, an Ismaili Da'i and courtier of al-Hakim. After his assassination, his cause was taken up by the Persian immigrant Hamza ibn 'Alī ibn Aḥmad, who in a 1017 letter demanded that all officers and courtiers should acknowledge power that was given by God to al-Hakim and the previous Fatimid Caliphs to unite and empower Islam. Hamza became the actual architect of the group.

Lastly it should be noted that both the Druze and the Syrian-Egyptian midrash geulah, Sefer Zerubavel, have in common a special place for specific mountains in Israel and Lebanon. (Not to mention that Fātimid caliph al-Ḥākim began to rule about 990 CE, a date specifically mentioned by Sefer Zerubavel).

Then he showed me the Temple and the structure. The Temple was built on the peaks of five mountains which the Lord had chosen to support His sanctuary: Lebanon, Mount Moriah, Tabor, Carmel, and Hermon. Michael spoke and said to me, ‘At the completion of nine hundred and ninety years for the ruins of Jerusalem is the appointed time for the deliverance of Israel.’ (Sefer Zerubavel).

Thus, according to this working theory the Druze (and perhaps other Ismaili) groups are:

  • The descendants of Parthians who converted in full or part to Judaism,
  • Who adopted messianic themes (Imamate) due to the relationship between the Prophet (and later Caliphs) and the Exilarch
  • Who adopted Noahide teachings directly from a Rabbinic source
  • Who alegorized and spiritualized messianic themes, as well as other Islamic teachings, due to gnostic Christian influences. (They are accused of praying to al-Ḥākim).
  • The are the precursors of Babism and Baha'i

References

  1. DNA testing, Druze are remarkable for their high frequency (35%) of males who carry the Y-chromosomal haplogroup L, which is otherwise uncommon in the Middle East (Shen et al 2004). This haplogroup originates from prehistoric South Asia, and is found today most commonly in India. There may be a connection there because the Parthian empire included Northern India. It was suggested to me that Kenite DNA does not match semitic ancestry because the Kenite Jethro was sent to the Midianites and was not himself a Midianite although he became Midians priest. Kenites were probably Parthian, and more than likely the ancient Kiyanians (Kiyanids) ruling dynasty. There is a DNA link between the Kna Jews and the Druze and the Kna Jews hold the septuagint tradition that Arpakhshad had a son called Kenan (whence the arabic names derive) who was the father of Shelah. So the Parthian explanation includes the explanation of the different DNA as we might expect.
  2. Armenian historian Sebeos
  3. Graetz
  4. Armenian historian Sebeos
  5. Tevuot HaAretz
  6. Benjamin of Tudela
  7. Seder Doros
  8. Iggeres R' Sherira Gaon
  9. A. Fratini, C. Prato, God-Fearers: A Solution to the Ancient Problem of the Identity of the Sabians, Rome, 2002
  10. Perhaps related to Onkelos' Salamai-Kenite connection.